Friday, 27 April 2012

JOUR1111Factual Story Telling Assessment



The Story of Gerry Murphy
Gerry Murphy grew up in one of the most infamous nations of history.   Zimbabwe, originally known as the “Breadbasket of Africa” has crippled due to poverty and a corrupt government run by Robert Mugabe. Gerry had the pleasure of knowing the nation while in its prime.
Born in the small town of Ndola, Zambia in 1955 to two Irish expatriates, Gerry grew up in a family who believed everyone was equal. Her father was an accomplished doctor who qualified in the late 1940s. There was no jobs at this time in Southern Ireland so they first moved to England, where they were subjected to, as Gerry calls it, shunning by the English. They called him an “Irish Mick.” Subsequently the colonies beckoned and like many around him, Gerry’s father found work in the British Railway in Zambia, working as the chief doctor before going into private practice. There were many Europeans who followed similar paths as Gerry’a father. At this time, Zambia (or Rhodesia as it was then known) held rich agrarian land which was very appealing. 
As a child she went to a German dominican convent with nuns that were as opinionated as were strict. She seemed to be the odd one out in certain circles because of her belief in the African natives. She frequently had stand up arguments with some of her closest friends about who would eventually lead the new nation after it gained independence in 1964. She always fought passionately, arguing that the land a lot of her friend’s lived on was rightfully the African’s. 
Like most European families, her's kept servants, which was considered the norm. All were of African decent. She says that they were all just part of the family. Gerry’s mother always gave them more on top of their salary. Whether it was extra food, clothing or money she was very generous. Gerry fondly remembers their childhood nanny, Flora. Her family lived in a different country. The only job Gerry says she could find was with her family, in Zambia, a 4 hour train ride as well as a boarder crossing from home.
As a little girl, Gerry was shocked when she spent the night at her friend's houses. Their servants were treated far worse than her family’s. She didn’t understand why. After all they were the rightful owners of this land. She had grown up having to make her own bed sometimes cook her own dinner without help from maids or servants, so why were her friends keeping their maids on until the early hours of the mornings, only allowing them a few hours sleep before starting breakfast the next morning?
It was 1969 when Gerry and family made the move to Zimbabwe. She recounts how she had an uncle in the south who they visited in holidays. Her father played a lot of golf and took to one of the local courses where he met a fellow Irishman. Also a GP, he was short staffed and to find someone of Gerry’s father’s calibre was rare. So a deal was made and Gerry moved to Africa.
After studying hard, Gerry eventually followed her father into medicine becoming a radiographer. Gerry chose to work in the African Hospital instead of the European one. She faced death and pain everyday. She always knew it was going to be a busy day when the helicopters arrived early, bringing in men, sometimes boys with their limbs blown off. As a week old student, Gerry was given the job of x-raying corpses to identify the number of bullets in them. She didn’t eat meat for three years.
It was around the time of Mugabe’s election to power that Gerry started to feel unsafe. Her work colleagues told horrific stories of cold blooded murder. A friend’s brother-in-law was going to pay his workers on his farm when three African men approached him. They surrounded him and pinned him down before dragging him inside his own home. He had enough time to yell to his wife and three young children, pleading them to run as the three men crushed him beneath the weight of cinderblocks. They did this for three long hours before putting him out of his misery with the aid of a bullet to the head. There was no police, no inquiry. It was all part of Mugabe’s ruthless land grab.
Gerry recalls how the Zimbabwe army would go around to white farmer’s land and divide it up for African people to call their own. There was never any argument by the Europeans, as they knew what would happen if there was. All these African people were promised land when Mugabe came to power, however none of them knew how to farm. Subsequently, this once rich agrarian society, The Breadbasket of Africa, was beginning to crumble.
Gerry knew it was time to go when her uncle was shot at point blank range for his land. Robert Mugabe’s regime was now in full swing, threatening those who defy.
Gerry was one of the lucky ones. She was able to find work in England, then move to Australia where she married and had one son. This was thanks to her Irish passport. However, her sister is still “stuck” there. The inflation is so bad that the money she earns in a week of work is redundant the next.
Gerry still sends food packages to her sister every month. 
Despite what has become of Zimbabwe, Gerry still holds fond memories of the land she left, the land she grew up in and learnt to adore and respect. She believes that Robert Mugabe is a simple power munger who is stripping the nation for all it’s worth, however with the power sharing deal struck with Morgan Tsvangirai, the future looks bright.
She still wishes to travel back to her home village of Ndola, when it is finally safe.

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

For the People -Community Media

In the recent JOUR1111 lecture, Public Media was discussed. It its my belief that if one wants intelligent and comprehensive news coverage, one turns to Public Media instead of the likes of Today Tonight or A Current Affair. Institutions such as the ABC and SBS may not be known for their variety of entertainment programs, yet their news and current affairs programs are nationally renowned.

Excuse the rant about news integrity but Commercial Media news is a real hatred of mine, especially the less than intelligent current affairs programs. They may address public issues, however they do it in a way that I believe is always one sided and completely lacks information.

Anyway, the real point of this post was for me to talk about the new and exciting opportunities for Community Media.
In previous posts, I have said that this new online based media world we live in provides countless opportunities for journalists to grab hold of. I also believe this new domain holds exciting possibilities for advances in Community Media.

One could say that this blog is a form of Community Media. The key point here is that with new technology comes the ease to create new, user generated content and broadcast it to an audience. Youtube is a perfect example of this. With limited resources you can set up your own channel and create content for an incalculable audience. Not for profit groups benefit from these outlets immensely as well.

Even though sites like Youtube may not be considered in the same league as TV, the argument still stands that you have to start somewhere.

A year ago I completed a week of production workshops with Bris31. (now 31 Digital) Many of the producers I worked with would not have been more than 5 years older than me and all of which had their own Youtube Channel.

I believe that Community Media is the way forward for one reason. User based and approved content. For the time being, there is little politics, little money matters and few programming issues for the generators of Community Media as their soul aim is to develop and put on air content that local audiences are familiar with.

Hopefully we will see the progression of this brand of media in the future. It is disappointing that media now days is heavily influenced by the likes of Fairfax ad News Limited, however it is good to see that Public Media and Community Media still hold their own in this developing environment.

Money Media

Commercial Media is responsible for some of Australia's highest rating programs currently. Channels such as 7, 9 and 10 all produce content which achieve very high viewer-ship. For example, Channel 9's new adaptation of the American series "The Voice" aired at an astounding 2.1 million viewers on its debut  on Sunday before hiking to 2.54 million on Monday night. (Sydney Morning Herald,  http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/nines-voice-drowns-out-rivals-as-viewers-remain-hooked-20120418-1x6ec.html) This goes to show that this gold mine of entertainment can potentially generate massive profit for these privately owned and operated media giants.

This bring two different points to light. Primarily, at what stage will Commercial Media care only about making money, and secondly will it simply monopolise the market? 

Addressed in the JOUR1111 lecture, Commercial Media is known to put profit before quality and tends to dumb down the content. It was branded "Micky Mouse news." Now this may well be all fine for those who reap the financial benefits from the media outlets, however this may increase the risk of a monopoly. Some may argue that the outlets such as Fairfax and News Limited already hold a slight monopoly over other outlets and especially Public Media. I believe there should be a stronger means of enforcing fair play amongst our media outlets. 

For example, it was outlined in the Hutchins Commission of 1947 that news outlets must "give a truthful, comprehensive an intelligent account of the days events" Instead, I believe we are seeing "Micky Mouse News" that is neither comprehensive nor intelligent. This, laced with the numerous ads that are the backbone of the channels I believe has lead to a gradual decrease in the quality and integrity of commercial media. 

It's all about the money.

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Media use over 10 Days


Media Use Diary Analysis and Comparison
Nick Biggs – JOUR1111 (T12)

Evidence suggests that the vast majority of younger students are far more oriented towards online and visual based media. As shown in the JOUR1111 survey. Over 75% of students have an internet-enabled smart phone, of which 95.4% use Facebook on it. This statement is reinforced by the statistics of Question12 – i.e. students predominantly use the internet between 2 and 4 hours a day.

My Media Usage over 10 Days
There is an obvious trend towards online media and social networking. This is to be expected in a course where the majority of students are between 17 and 20 years old.  However this fact has other facets that should be examined, for example the difference in internet usage and the frequency of certain online applications.

As is clearly represented in the survey, Facebook is the primary time waster of students, with a staggering 397 students out of the possible 432 indicating the social media site was one which they frequented. My results are complimentary to this trend. I average 126 minutes on the site, generally for entertainment and leisure purposes (see table).


Visual Representation of media usage per day
Although many online journals, politicians and news outlets have their own Facebook pages, it would be safe to say that students mostly use the site to socialise.  This trend or pattern, I believe stems from a need to simply socialise and have a need for fast information. This notion is generally agreed upon by leading specialists, including a report written by the IRMA (Information Resources Management Association) which says “teens…are trying our different identities, …being impulsive and idealistic.” (http://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/39722/, 2010) I believe this not only shows that I have a strong attachment to online media, but also defines the path that Journalism should be heading in.

Despite my figures for Facebook and General Browsing, I do also tend to read the newspaper for an average of 30 minutes every day. This is contrary to the preconceived notion of the survey. It is evident that the internet plays a very important part in the lives of many teens; however I believe I am one of a minority that still read a newspaper. However if we look at the statistics from the survey, 43.1% of students still read articles online. This only proves the positive relationship between Journalism and online media. 

This once again shows the positive relationship between online media and journalism.
Another aspect of visual media to examine is the role TV plays in the distribution of information. 29.9% of students indicated that they watched TV (either broadcast or online) for between 1 and 2 hours a day. I can confirm that I watch the 7pm ABC news every night and then some morning news on days I have off. Apart from this I normally watch TV for entertainment purpose (despite the comparably  large amount of time I watch it.). I believe that this is the same case for the rest of the JOUR1111 students.

In conclusion, based on y results and the results from the JOUR1111 survey, it is evident that there is a positive relationship between online and visual based media, and Journalism. As indicated, mediums like Radio and Newspapers drag behind in daily usage. I believe that my relationship with Journalism is, and will continue to be, a highly online and multimedia based one.

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

It's your choice

Now the cloud of dust has settled from the state election, I thought I would add my two cents worth on our means of voting.

This year was the first I was legally allowed to vote. Having had an interest in politics since middle school, I was very keen to have my say. Which I did....despite this my seat of Yerongpilly is still undecided....fantastic.

One thing that interested me about the state election was the means by which voters could express their support for candidates. Voters could choose one of to options; either place the number "1" in the box adjacent to the preferred candidate, or place their numbered preferences in all the boxes.

I believe voting is a private matter, however I am happy to disclose that I used the preferential system, placing my preferred candidates in my preferred order. The thing that upsets me is that this method is not compulsory for state elections.
I know it is compulsory in federal and local elections so why not state?

There are suggestions that the Full Preferential Voting (FPV) system was to blame for Australia's hung parliament during the 2010 election, however I believe this is best for the integrity and democracy of a nation. At the risk of sounding like a radical lefty, everyone should have a fair go.

There are some who say that, like Britain, we should adopt the system where by first past the post is the winner (FPTP). The ABC's election analyst Antony Green expresses this in his blog, http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2011/04/index.html. 


He writes; 
"The simplest re-interpretation of the Australian result using FPTP rules suggests the election would have produced a majority for the current opposition, the Liberal and National Party Coalition...yet despite evidence the Australian Coalition could have won under FPTP, both parties in the Coalition remain committed to retaining full preferential voting, the National Party even re-confirming its opposition to FPTP and the optional preferential AV system as recently as two weeks ago."

I agree with Green to an extent, some Australians would have much rather seen a clean victory then have to have put up with all the fuss over the Independents. However, I still believe that when voting for a leader who has more influence over your life then any other (i.e. the Premier of your state) the requirement should be given to show what you want from your leader, by showing all your preferences. 

Conversations

Sound in Journalism, to hear it from the mouth of two of ABC Radio's A-class presenters was a fantastic experience and one of the more engaging lectures I have listened to.

One thing I picked up from both Richard Fidler and Steve Austin was to respect and listen to an interviewee. Whether they be a member of the public on talk back or a studio interview, remember to listen, understand and respond respectfully.This way, a subject will feel more relaxed and willing to answer your questions. As Austin said, listening implies respect.

I believe this notion is not only applies whole heartedly to interviews, but could be adopted to day to day life.

Working in customer service, I have developed a subconscious hatred for complaining customers. This idea of simply listening to their problem and attempting to understand could be quite valuable.

After listening to the lecture I went straight to iTunes and subscribed to Fidler's podcasts, his way of extracting a story truly amazes me. The way in which he can say so little, yet still draw a story from a subject is sublime.

This does seem to be the case, less is more. At least when it comes to Radio.

Friday, 23 March 2012

Text

I digress.
A couple of weeks ago, guest lecturer Skye Doherty explained the value of text in today's media.
Apprehensive at first, I began to understand that although we tend to associate online and TV Journalism with images, text really is the corner stone of any story, and will continue to be.

Doherty's explanation of this concept did not only provide incite to, lets be honest, a room of predominately internet focused students, but also provided detail into the set up of online articles. Fantastic.

In the future I maintain that the visual aspects of Journalism (i.e. pictures and video) will flourish in a  rich multimedia environment. There are many article written about the subject. I found one (despite being written in 2009) that suggests that rich media should be embedded in press releases sent to journalists. http://mumbrella.com.au/prs-urged-send-us-your-giant-emails-plain-text-journalism-is-dead-9430

However, after this lecture that image of mine seems a little hazy. Sure, vivid imagery can often provoke a far more intensive emotional response from an audience, yet when included with text can only enhance the experience.

I know this means physically reading it (pfft, reading. Who does that now days...?.) but to be honest, text can still rival images and is still most certainly needed in modern day media.